Mining At Ranger : A Long Term Disaster
![]()
- In the development of the Ranger mine some fundamental design mistakes were made which continue to cause problems for the mine operators, ERA, and which annually increase the risk of contamination of Kakadu.
- Rainfall records used to estimate the total annual rainfall at the Ranger mine site were inaccurate. They provided an underestimation of actual rainfall. Data used to estimate the rate at which water would evaporate from the retention ponds overestimated the evaporation rate. More rain and less evaporation have resulted in an overall accumulation of polluted water in the mine site. What to do with this contaminated water is a constant problem at Ranger.
- The cheapest way to deal with excess water is to dump it. Consequently in above average rainfall seasons, ERA regularly applies to release water into the Magella Creek system and from there, into the Kakadu National Park wetlands. To date no release has been permitted. In the 1994/95 wet season ERA went to court to override the concerns of the downstream traditional owners and could legally have released contaminated water into the Magella. ERA has refused to rule out the possibility of releases in the future and indeed considered it again in the 1995/96 wet season.
- The proposed development of the Jabiluka mine will involve considerable de-watering of the underground tunnels as the ore is situated below the water table. This contaminated water will need to be disposed of, adding to the already critical water management problems.
- The reality of the Ranger environmental assault on Kakadu can be seen by reference to the incidents reported in the Supervising Scientist Annual Reports (1985-1996). These are only some of the environmental breaches reported - the real impacts of the mine may not be known for years.
Page last updated November 30, 1997.
Back to the Ranger Archives or Back to the Uranium Resources Page
Copyright © SEA-US 1997